It's more that with POST the server decides what URL the resource is at, with PUT the client does. PUT is tricky for round tripping as GET, modify, PUT means the client has to fully parse the object it's replacing, and is easier to accidentally write a race condition that way.

@loke
Jag är mest fundersam på varför de tror att de ska kunna bilda regering på en enda fråga.
Förvisso är fiendens fiende min vän men den är ju absolut inte min allierad.

@Sandra

And if you can, send some money their way. This place runs on donations.

Misskeyバー、一回は覗いてみたい気がするが、はてさて
年齢層とか気になる

It's more that with POST the server decides what URL the resource is at, with PUT the client does. PUT is tricky for round tripping as GET, modify, PUT means the client has to fully parse the object it's replacing, and is easier to accidentally write a race condition that way.

@eramdam they'll run under quickjs rust 🤪

Misskeyバー、一回は覗いてみたい気がするが、はてさて
年齢層とか気になる

@andre Ich bin "nur" Angestellter, aber auch im Betriebsrat. Da kriegt man einen guten Einblick.

• Lemmy, Piefed, PyLova, Mbin
• All the apps (and there are quite a few)
• All the alternatives UIs (Photon, Blorp, old, etc.)

Thank you everyone

Dont forget the instance operators who actually keep the servers running. Donations keep instances up.

Don’t just say how much you love them. Donate to your instances monthly and make it easier for them to be sustainable.

@Blender FWIW I did try blender-5.3.0-beta+v53.32f5c9c48bca-windows.arm64-release and blender-5.3.0-beta+v53.32f5c9c48bca-linux.x86_64-release before compiling locally, but no dice then.

@hannah@hai.z0ne.social the heck?

Couldn’t go to my dentist appointment this morning as their SaaS records/appointment provider was “down”. One to watch out for in the ransomware news this week then 😅

@hacks4pancakes
A great summary of the journey. Understanding the whole problem is only way to develop appropriate solutions.

You cannot spell assistance without siesta

@snowfox @whitequark

The problem (which @whitequark framed fairly succinctly as ‘calling the cops on the cops doesn’t work’) is that you are trying to oppose an entrenched power structure (big corporations) by relying on an entrenched power structure (the legal system).

The rule of thumb in companies for enforcing IP laws is to budget about a million dollars per enforcement action. Sometimes it’s cheaper, sometimes it’s more expensive. Generally, it’s much cheaper if you have more money because no one really wants to be in court when the other side is able to spend ten or a hundred times as much as you can to hire the world’s best barristers in this specific field. So simply having a huge pile of money biases the system toward you, and that’s the system that you’re using as your weapon against trillion dollar companies.

In theory, a well-funded foundation can help balance this. In practice, it doesn’t often work. I contributed to a GNU project where we had clear evidence of a startup taking our LGPL’d code and selling it in a proprietary product without releasing the changes. The FSF decided it was too expensive to sue. Eventually the startup was bought and the founders made a pile of money. At the same time, other small companies that wanted to play by the rules avoided us because the LGPLv3 libraries and GPLv3 tools were considered too high risk by their lawyers.

GPLv3 and AGPLv3 especially are increasingly used by corporate open source that wants to retain control over their ecosystem. And they’re chosen because that’s what they are very good at. If I contribute to an MIT-licensed project, I have almost the same rights on my contributed code as I would have if I had written it in isolation. With a copyleft license, I have fewer rights. This means that it’s easy for the centre of mass of a project to exert complete control. It is not a coincidence that the open-source kernel that has the greatest amount of corporate control is GPL’d: the license encourages centralisation of power.

If you look at the top contributions of GCC, they are IBM (under their ‘Red Hat’ brand), Qualcomm, and SUSE. Three companies make up over 50% of contributions to GCC in the last year. In LLVM, the top three corporate contributors are only 34% of the total, the next largest aggregate is individual contributors, and then no other corporation is responsible for more than 5% of the contributions in the last year.

A company that can afford to spend millions on lawyers will find loopholes. AGPLv3 forces you to distribute your code. But you can still provide open extensions that are wrappers around some RPC to a proprietary service. Or, if you’re a company that controls a project, you can require a CLA and provide ‘enterprise-only’ features that are proprietary and sell an open-core system and put all competitors at a disadvantage because they can’t tightly couple their extensions or the core, but you can.

The GPL family is the license family of corporate control. The ‘viral’ nature requires strong coupling to propagate. This encourages the kind of software-development model that benefits corporations.

If you want to avoid corporate dominance, make it easy for end users to extend your programs. Make it easy for end users to share their extensions. Intentionally create ecosystems where the original creators do not control the wider ecosystem. That makes it very hard for a corporation to exert control because what would they even try to control? If they hire the core developers, they get control over a small fraction of the ecosystem and the rest ignores them if they go in a silly direction, because every component is trivial to fork and trivial for someone else to maintain.

Require cooperation not through complex legalese (which adds a barrier to entry for anyone who doesn’t have a legal team on staff) but by creating ecosystems where everything has multiple interchangeable options.

Don’t build the big AGPL’d monoliths that are prime targets for corporate control.

MicLock stops a Mac microphone switch from making Bluetooth headphones sound muffled

https://lockergnome.com/mac-headphones-muffled-miclock-default-microphone-fix/

#tech #GenerativeAI

It’s annoying that you can’t trust these days that the emails you get are coming from actual people and not bots

Not that I was good at answering emails before, but the increase in volume and added doubt doesn’t help.

Banning a serial abuser from a specific gathering is not revenge. It is not exclusion from society as a whole.

Refusal to ban a serial
abuser from a specific gathering excludes people who did nothing wrong, and makes the whole event more sexist, more racist, more exclusionary.