Completely public

tomorrow, 8 November, Aaron Swartz should be tuning 40 years old

#aaronswartz

I can see why Melvor Idle 2 doesn't have bronze in it and it's because that puts the most micromanage-y part of the skill at the start of the game

From the technical side anyone can spin up their own Lemmy instance and view all votes, but I'm curious at what the community's perspective on how "private" that is. I think Mbin already shows upvoters? Piefed allows anonymous voting. I also know there are sites which show all voting history, but assuming those are fairly disliked.

My general questions to the community: - Do you expect your votes to be private, or just not shown in the UI? - Would per-voter votes showing up on another aggregator platform bother you, even though your instance already shares them with other servers?

For context I'm the dev doing some two way bridge interop between atproto + Threadiverse, in atproto the votes/likes are generally publicly accessible, you just look at the users repo through something like pdsls.dev, they're readable and archivable by anyone. In my opinion this isn't that big of a problem since it's fairly hard to look at and discern (Ex all my votes: https://pdsls.dev/at://did:plc:lmdkqemqrqnfiix72pyjhfey/social.coves.feed.vote). Ultimately trying to figure out if there's already a mutual understanding that they are public and we can just mirror them or whether they should stay hidden as an aggregate.

@startrekgifs

I think it's too wide for Scouts.

@startrekgifs The Girl Who Made the Stars

@ai6yr 😂 oh no!

@Luke thank you!!!! - yea going full font library + textures in photoshop and having lots of fun

@LabSpokane @gerg I mean, there are plenty of screwed and less-than-representative up things in US democracy (the Senate and the electoral college for starters), but it’s hard to understand what there is to complain about with the existence of provisional ballots, of all things. They’re an important safeguard against procedural disenfranchisement.

I've been carrying around an idea for a federated code forge for a while. Two things sharpened it recently: Tangled's post on the federated code forge, which builds a forge on the AT Protocol, and a Jujutsu workshop (Korean) by Seongmin Lee (@boltless.me), who works at Tangled, held at @turingappledev.

My version would build on ForgeFed, the #ActivityPub protocol for code forges (spec), so that repositories, issues and merge requests federate the way posts already do. The idea is early enough that I haven't even come up with a codename. What I want from it, roughly:

• Git and Jujutsu (so-called jj) as equal clients. Not Git hosting with Jujutsu support bolted on, but a forge that understands both, so what Jujutsu is actually good at, stacked changes, becomes a first-class unit of review instead of a pile of separate pull requests.
• No owner layer. Since the point is federation, one instance represents one person or one organization, permissions are managed per server, and a repository lives at forge.example/myrepo instead of forge.example/owner/myrepo.
• A migration path off GitHub that keeps the history. Importing the code is easy; importing the issues, pull requests and discussions with their original authors attached is the part that matters. I'd keep a placeholder for each GitHub account and let whoever owns that account prove it, after which the instance swaps in their fediverse actor, so attribution carries over. How to express that claim in ActivityPub is the part I haven't figured out. It may need a new FEP.

Where this stands: I haven't read the whole #ForgeFed spec, Fedify doesn't ship the vocabulary yet (fedify-dev/fedify#751), and I have too much else going on to start soon. If you've run a forge or implemented ForgeFed, I'd like to hear whether any of this makes sense.

#codeforge #fediverse #fedidev

"Could a person with ADHD do THIS?" I declaim, throwing out the slice of bread that has been sitting in the bag on the counter for over five weeks

I’m trying to figure out which is better (or worse I guess) if it’s the wrong Dana White or the right Dana White.

I don't think so @darth_hideout
I understood Holodeck Rescues #10

[w]

This seem to stem from a misunderstanding. Lemmy and Mastodon have different goals. Users of each generally don’t want the other’s content generally showing up en masse.

If you want to see something from Mastodon, you can usually get it on Lemmy, and vice versa. I don’t often see Mastodon posts either, but that’s because I only follow Lemmy communities, so I only see them when someone on Mastodon tags a Lemmy community in their post. If you want to see more Mastodon content, see if you can follow some users or hashtags from Lemmy.

But that might not be supported; I haven’t tried. If you prefer Mastodon, I’m pretty sure that you can follow Lemmy communities from there.

@mistersql Looks like lots of folks have played in this area!

/me closes editor/

on the plus side the brake parts look a lot better now

#BikeRepair #BikeTooter #ScottSantaFe

@mastodonmigration

I'm saying now it's not so much a mentality of losing by the voters, I'm saying the voters did what they could with a single election but we now have what we have for these next two years. And if they don't deliver it will end in a bigger disaster than Trump.

I'm not saying to stop trying, just pointing out centrism has put us behind, and it will continue to put us behind until we eject it entirely from the party. You cannot find a halfway point between fascism and progress

@oneiros

Ayanna Pressley would be a great Speaker of the House.

We can’t have a speaker who’s taken $150,000 from Peter Thiel’s Anduril, tens of thousands from executives of Palantir, hundreds of thousands from AIPAC, and secret meeetings with Jared Kushner.

You would have supported Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court, with that kind of thinking.

https://futurism.com/future-society/hakeem-jeffries-donors-corporate-controversial-tech-companies