@amlor Thanks! Was it Tuba that hid the link completely? I see GTS is actually sending an anchor but without setting the href... Tuba probably just skips it as broken, I'll see about keeping it as is instead!

> It doesn't do it when the post is opened directly on the instance page though

It seems that it's the same situation there too, the link is styled, because it's an actual anchor, but doesn't lead to anywhere / is not clickable :/

https://codeberg.org/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/issues/2516

@fiend_unpleasant @dumpsterqueer couldn't put it better myself.

If anyone reading this wants to help support them ⬇️
https://opencollective.com/gotosocial

@vantablack is the neighbor a bird?

@dansup @dumpsterqueer I'm sorry but [at]dumpsterqueer[at]superseriousbusiness.org is the best part of this post. I mean what!? That is amazing! That maybe the best handle on the entire fediverse!

@fiend_unpleasant @dumpsterqueer she also built the coolest fediverse platform, carefully yet powerfully, bringing privacy and safety to the fediverse in a way no other project had, and now we use interactionControl across Mastodon, Pixelfed and a few FEPs.

It's pretty iconic tbh

@chris Basically they are limited to whatever the admin allows for max # of people, which by default is 10.

I am considering allowing creators with more than 100 followers to create a special group chat that they can limit who can post to, and appears on their profile.

We are also working on a Close Friends feature, which allows you to combine all of them in one chat that you all can share Posts, Stories, media and texts to.

@amlor Hi 👋 I'm not sure about Phanpy, but Tuba doesn't actually touch the links at all, which makes me suspect that maybe there's something going on with the way GoToSocial sends it to the clients (FWIW, from my instance, I see it as shown on mastodon-web, with the full scheme).

I don't have access to a federated GTS instance, so would you mind helping both me and Phanpy debug this a bit?

Open your browser's web inspector network tab and search for this post and send back the "content" field

Just successfully tested a Pixelfed Group chat between , GotoSocial and Mastodon!

Also got some great feedback from @dumpsterqueer on how to improve this on our side, so we prepend mentions like they do.

You love to see it ❤️

(Btw: You will be able to use this app with non-pixelfed servers, like GotoSocial and Mastodon later this year!)

#pixelfed

@Zergy Un pognon de dingue. Et pourtant nos entreprises restent médiocres.

Mais c'est plus légitime aux yeux de Macron de donner de l'argent aux entreprises qui ne deviennent pas des leaders mondiaux qu'en donner aux pauvres qui restent pauvres.

RE: https://mastodon.social/@paul_denton/117393834335661595

On rappel que le CICE et le CIR, c'est environ 300 MILLIARDS par an.

Ed ecco il terzo episodio del podcast di @margaret su #AutisticiInventati https://omny.fm/shows/cool-people-who-did-cool-stuff/part-three-autistici-inventati-and-the-fight-for-the-autonomous-internet #KeepITFree

Days since a LLM ruined my mood; by directly vomiting in my direction at work: 0, again.

@aral I would be so embarrassed

@abhiyantrik Both issues have been fixed in the latest release!

https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed/117393942902793496

Pixelfed for Android (v2.0.1) is available 🥳

This fixes many reported bugs, keep the feedback coming!

APK Download ⬇️

https://github.com/pixelfed/pixelfed-rn/releases/tag/v2.0.1

#pixelfed #pixelfedForAndroid

"A new study examining the links between race, wealth, and incarceration found that, while poor youth of all races were more likely than wealthy kids to go to prison, the likelihood of incarceration was higher for African Americans at every level of wealth compared to white youth."

– https://eji.org/news/study-rich-black-kids-more-likely-incarcerated-than-poor-white-kids/?hl=en

(This is why class reductionists + "no war but class war" people miss the mark)

@drwhax@infosec.exchange

Specialy on matrix.org

Is better outside

and I think that this is part of the big disconnect and major source of friction between some ideologically-based communities, i.e. AI proponents and never-ai adherents: one group thinks they are sharing and thus exhibiting care while the other group interprets what is being shared as a strong signal that the person sharing doesn’t care about the same things as they do. I honestly believe that most people who are reaching to the current swarm of AI technologies being foisted on consumers and tech nerds in particular think they are doing so in order to share something with others. I believe they are trying to participate in activities they think others will gain value from, activities that others will care about, without understanding that by not putting forth the effort to actually do it they’re indicating that they don’t care about the thing in nearly the same way as people who put time and thought and energy into actually creating the thing themselves to share with others. it goes way deeper than “machine bad” or even “machine under central control bad” and points more towards groups of people who do not mean the same things when they use certain words. unless some form of translation is put in place that is bi-directional, communication on the topics using those words just isn’t going to be successful.