I'm seeing a lot of single-author papers like "I used [LLM] to help me understand [LLM-produced result], and then wrote up my own understanding."
Rather than multi-author papers like "We got together in a reading group to try to understand [LLM-produced result] and here's what we came up with."
Yet another example of how, even when people pursue human understanding of LLM-produced math results, *using chatbots to do it* weakens community ties instead of strengthening them. A real missed opportunity.