I’m not very fond of LLM-coding generally speaking myself, but this is an extremely important point to be aware of.
0 Boosts
0 Likes
This federated comment is not yet available here.
@dalias @torb I can see how bringing up accessibility in an unrelated thread could derail it, but you were already talking about accessibility here. When I give you a firsthand example and the response is "I won’t judge you for using it," followed by judgment of people who bring up why it matters, what I hear is "sure, use it, just keep that relevant experience out of the conversation and shut up, AI bad bad!" That tbh feels a bit ableist to me. We think this tech is bad, and even though it improves the lives of a minority, we're going to tell that minority that that doesn't matter and to stay out of the conversation.
@TheQuinbox @torb It's not a matter of derailment but sowing doubt and trying to convince people working to reject and stop AI to back down.
@dalias @torb I talk all the time about what worries me about AI, especially how much control a handful of companies ran by corrupt billionairs have over it. And yeah, I do want people to reconsider rejecting it outright. Being able to use a device on my own when I used to need a sighted person is a real benefit. Why shouldn’t that count when we’re deciding what to do about the tech?
@torb It's bad faith. The OP in the thread you linked is a known bad actor exploiting disabled folks as props for a pro-slop agenda.
@torb AI does not take care of accessibility needs. It makes an excuse not to solve them by pretending folks who need accommodations can be satisfied by low quality scraps from the slop bots acting as intermediaries between them and the inaccessible things.
If it's a political debate I'd agree: slop isn't the solution.
But if we're talking about real people suffering from the absence of an accessibility device... If they can slop it I hope they slop it. At least until they win they're fight to get the real solution.
So to anyone in distress who thinks slop can be of temporary help, consider it without guilt.
You're use won't change a thing to the success / failure of gen AI : it will fail anyway.
The bet is dozens of trillions invested to replace mankind with AGI powered robots. It's not having a disabled person make an accessibility device to help with something... Especially if that something is so niche the app doesn't exist already.
@torb The tech industry treats this disabled survival as free marketing. They frame themselves as saviors while exploiting the marginalized community they actively helped to disenfranchise. https://sightlessscribbles.com/posts/a-thermodynamic-failure-of-the-soul/
