I’m not very fond of LLM-coding generally speaking myself, but this is an extremely important point to be aware of.
@torb AI does not take care of accessibility needs. It makes an excuse not to solve them by pretending folks who need accommodations can be satisfied by low quality scraps from the slop bots acting as intermediaries between them and the inaccessible things.
If it's a political debate I'd agree: slop isn't the solution.
But if we're talking about real people suffering from the absence of an accessibility device... If they can slop it I hope they slop it. At least until they win they're fight to get the real solution.
So to anyone in distress who thinks slop can be of temporary help, consider it without guilt.
You're use won't change a thing to the success / failure of gen AI : it will fail anyway.
The bet is dozens of trillions invested to replace mankind with AGI powered robots. It's not having a disabled person make an accessibility device to help with something... Especially if that something is so niche the app doesn't exist already.
@torb It's bad faith. The OP in the thread you linked is a known bad actor exploiting disabled folks as props for a pro-slop agenda.