RE: https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/117540788341445069
I can't remember who I learned this from (maybe @raganwald?) but a good trick for reading computer science papers if you work in industry is
1. Find a bunch of papers on the problem you need to solve.
2. Notice what baseline they're all comparing their new shiny techniques to.
3. Implement that instead.
The most depressing thing about the current bubble is that so many of the flagship ‘look how amazing AI is!’ things are things where LLMs are a pretty poor fit and other techniques work much better, but the baseline for comparison uses well under 10% of the compute, often under 1%. If you threw 10% of the memory and processor capacity at the non-LLM approach, it would work much better than the LLM approach. Yet it’s easy for OpenAI or Anthropic to burn $10M on a tech demo and incredibly hard to get anyone to spend $1M on a good solution to the same problem.
As long as money is flowing to these companies, they’re starving interesting research of resources because there’s no incentive to build efficient systems when a company is willing to set fire to investors’ money to run the horribly inefficient version for you.