On what license should Claywonder be under? Even if anyone can just replicate the work easily, reverse engineer it, etc. I still feel like the MIT license and co are utterly fucking cucked
GPL 3?
0 Boosts
0 Likes
Blurry Moon
@sun@shitposter.world
·
activity timestamp
2 hr. ago
@coolboymew I do almost all my AI stuff under AGPL so no one can exploit it behind a server to avoid releasing changes
@sun
>Under plain GPLv3, copyleft obligations trigger only when you distribute a copy of the software. If you run it as a backend SaaS and never ship binaries, you have no obligation to release your source. AGPLv3 closes that "SaaS loophole": network interaction counts as distribution for source-disclosure purposes.
Thanks, AGPL sounds great
>Under plain GPLv3, copyleft obligations trigger only when you distribute a copy of the software. If you run it as a backend SaaS and never ship binaries, you have no obligation to release your source. AGPLv3 closes that "SaaS loophole": network interaction counts as distribution for source-disclosure purposes.
Thanks, AGPL sounds great
![[nanachi] TOTAL EMPLOYMENT - S03E07 [1080p].mkv](https://mk.magicka.org/files/c7153a78-b5ab-46c5-9223-1d9c1d1dbf6d.png "[nanachi] TOTAL EMPLOYMENT - S03E07 [1080p].mkv")
@coolboymew@shitposter.world @sun@shitposter.world I'll be using AGPL for my AI agent over email distribution lists abomination too
