saw someone talk about wafrn and make like so many wrong assumptions based on bias that is very easily explained in the span of 3 posts

like they complain about "wafrn users always just talking about their site" as if there isn't a very clear motive to doing that right now when bluesky fucks up and people want to raise awareness about ATProto migrations; it's also an easily disproven point by just looking at various ppl's profiles and scrolling past the last 48h or so and seeing that people post art, short quips and all the usual stuff you would expect

another thing is that they have a gripe with app.wafrn.net's rules being "deeply unserious" but like. friend our platform is called We Allow Female Representing Nipples, it's kind of our whole thing, do you realise that

idk it's just like, do they listen to what they're saying?? and realise that this lived experience is not necessarily the objective situation of things which is easily proven by just going to anyone's profiles?? or like damn if you don't wanna do that then just like… add "wafrn" to your word mutes

another thing is how they are provoking ppl by doing "hi wafrn users (I know you namesearch)" like no bitch I saw this on the for you feed

idk I don't get why one would think or act like this, but disproving shit like this requires way more effort than just putting bullshit into the world so I just blocked 'em instead