@rysiek isn't the whole "I can run an independent OS" also hinged on the prerequisite that:
a) some "trusted" corpo has benevolently signed your first stage bootloader shim;
and/or
b) that your government allows hardware to be sold which can have Secure Boot disabled / allows arbitrary signing keys?
The way I see it, that we currently have all the prerequisites in place for some fascist government to say: "Hey, for security reasons, we will only allow devices to be sold that have enabled Secure Boot and ship our list of pre-approved Corpo and Government signing keys."
After that it would be a relatively small step to say:"Hey, for security reasons we can only allow your bootloader shim to be signed if you correctly implement our dystopian surveillance features :)"
@wall_e yeah, I am really worried about all the age verification BS being pushed around the world now. That can very easily lead to "oh we need government-mandated OSes on all devices otherwise we cannot trust the age verification signal! think of the children!"
