Epilogue, I guess. I think this might be really useful to un-wedge a lot of current discourse, where:
1. It's very easy to get people to agree that FOSS has failed humanity, because it conceptualizes the Four Freedoms as apolitical and politics out of scope.
2. Getting people to agree what to do instead is a difficult organizational problem. What terms to use? What standards to hold?
So, I say, we organically let people bind together into small groups of closely aligned values. You doing MOSS? Cool! You prefer to call what you're doing Convivial Software? Heeyyyy that's cool too. We can build coalitions on top of that substrate, owned by no specific group or person, based on things we can find common ground on, without making the old mistake of trying to make everyone conform to the same super-specific values.