that is separate from igf jurors holding a hard line, which is their prerogative and I don't have an opinion about. Other people are free to set their thresholds for acceptability as total abstinence. I just personally don't find it helpful to lump together every possible LLM use as being the same thing and having the same magnitude of harm. Treating 10 lines of manually reworked code as being equivalent to 1 million lines of unread sludge makes it more difficult to talk about the harm to labor and the environment in the 1 million lines case.
@jonny the difference is that the first *aspires* to be the second. so yeah, treating as them as the same thing is quite justifiable and entirely useful for anti-ai discourse.
