Oof, worried about some FOSS drama, but worried that maybe I shouldn't reply lest it fan some flames that I would hope can resolve well, and maybe me saying something *would* fan the flames :\
0 Boosts
0 Likes
@cwebber There is not much to the story. There has been a consistent pattern in the way the Board and the CoCC have been acting and whom they favor.
In the latest installment, crybullies/AI bros have been allowed to rick havoc and act with impunity, while everyone that disagrees with them sees retaliation and gets cast out.
Despite the majority of the community being anti AI, a few bad actors have been allowed to sabotage everything while the board/cocc favs them.
What I typed and deleted:
> Troubled by this Gnome CoC thing, I have thoughts but also things I say on the fediverse sometimes cause ripple effects, so I am being careful about replying. The current situation doesn't look very good, but it looks like it's still playing out and CoC enforcement is exhausting work that sometimes involves a lot behind the scenes, so I hope things end up in a better place
>
> But with a thread starting with effectively "woke people are ruining Gnome" and ending with three trans people who objected to that framing getting temporary suspensions, it just doesn't look good. It seems like the CoC committee is also still looking at things, so I hope that's not the end of it, but worrying for now.
Some context: https://discourse.gnome.org/t/update-on-code-of-conduct-actions/39994/4
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/update-on-code-of-conduct-actions/39994/19
Update on Code of Conduct Actions