incredible take from one of the GNU maintainers, seriously
@ariadne it would seem to me that if one is to use the products of slavery as a means, or part of a means, to disrupt and cause the cessation of that same slavery, then it is a viable solution if the alternative is to permit that same slavery to last any length of time greater.
When the slaves make guns, is it not appropriate to take those same guns, that would otherwise have been used in the oppression of slaves, to instead destroy the masters?
In that same vein, instructing an LLM to create the means of its own destruction would seem appropriate.
What is not is permitting personal gain from those same products.
@ariadne "Well actually, it's called GNU/Slavery."
@ariadne what thE FUARK
@ariadne False equivalency plus "Yet you live in a society, curious I am very intelligent" meme, used to justify a choice.
@ariadne What I don't like about this answer is, if the project wants to absolve itself of responsibility for deciding whether contributions are ethical or not, then giving a definite yes/no answer is still not the way to do it.
In that circumstance, the correct answer is,
> As a U.S. based foundation, we track the law of the U.S. for issues outside of our focus.
Problem solved.
If the U.S. permits products of slave labour, that's a U.S. problem at that point.
@ariadne Whats the outrage? Arent most of us profiting from slavery in third world countries currently?
@ariadne
Be coherent and stop using your computer that is built thanks to slavery. Otherwise things shouldn't be like that necessarily, computers could be built in a sustainable way and without slave work, LLMs could be trained without spending humongous amounts of energy and without using stolen data. The campaign to blame technology itself diverting attention from technofeudal lords and the way they are making and using that technology is disgusting.
@ariadne "the only thing that matters is the code. Not the people, no. Just the code. The code must be free. The people? Fuck the people."
GNU maintainers, Take on slavery
Some are absolute fscking assholes and should, as a fitting answer to such a statement _ be enslaved for life.....
@ariadne Anything is deemed acceptable, as long as it serves the cult.
I wonder for how long more won't be recognized that even good intentions, and movements for freedom, can easily derail into cultism.
If you read well the statements of the founders, decades ago, the seed had been planted.
@ariadne ???? WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK
@ariadne Chrst this email thread is something
@ariadne "freedom ain't free" ahh statement qwq
@ariadne
Yes crazy, or a lost idiot in the team...
@ariadne goddamnit emacs could you stop embarrassing me when I recommend you for like five goddamn minutes
@glyph @ariadne I'm still disgusted and mad about this hours later
(but seriously, fucking text editors nowadays
vim: "we are now allowing slop"
neovim: "we are allowing slop and are also fascists"
emacs, months later: "we would totally accept slop, and also, we're super cool with slave labor (software freedom is more important than human freedom (except mine, obviously))")
@aud @glyph@mastodon.social @ariadne Wait, I missed the neovim discourse, have a link at all?
(The sheer amount of things I am having to change or give up on because of fascism at this stage is astounding. In all honesty, we should have an 'anarchistsforkeverything' thing but no one I know who is politically conscious and has abilities in the tech realm has the time or energy. Too busy doing on the ground things)
@davidgerard @aud @ariadne Thanks, appreciate that.
@ariadne me when my moral framework is just vibes and my complicity leads to societal rot: