RE: https://mastodon.online/@keefmarshall/117523584597660345
Are you bounded to quote a quote about #bonkwave ? But what if it's not bonkwave ?
0 Boosts
0 Likes
@keefmarshall @akash to answer this I think we must first prove if B == NB
Re: B == NB
It's a widely accepted hypothesis that "bonk wave is not bonk wave" - see for example, the works of @sknob here: https://music.bonkwave.org/not-what-i-call-bonk-wave-volume-003-disc-a/2/
.. but, to my knowledge, it is not yet proven.
@keefmarshall @akash @sknob exactly. I know this is colloquially assumed to be true, and I deeply respect the works of sknob et al, but a bonkematical proof would be nice. I do wonder if such can be attained at all, or if this is impossible by law of nature.
@bazkie @keefmarshall @akash I have to interject to note that this work ends with the conjecture that “Bonkwave is not”.
@keefmarshall @bazkie @akash @sknob However, is the hypothesis clear on what it states? Is it "bonkwave == not bonkwave" or "bonkwave != bonkwave"?
@akash
This brings up an important scientific principle for discussion: Is "bonkwaveness" or "bonkwavicity" a transitive quality?
So, for example, if post A is #BonkWave and post B quotes post A, does this automatically make post B #BonkWave as well? Or does it become #NotBonkWave until proven otherwise?
Conversely, if post A is definitely #NotBonkWave, but post B *is* #BonkWave, and quotes post A, does this transfer bonkwavicity retrospectively?
Bonkosophers, we need your thoughts here.