![gwl [he/him]](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/cbf4c6a4-7ad1-49fc-8012-709c4f57cead.webp "gwl [he/him]")
If anything you should do every possible option, a war fought on many fronts is more likely to be won than lost
1 Boost
8 Likes
Ah, so was WWII fought on just one front?
And here’s me thinking that it was a war fought in many fronts, and that was a large reason why it was won against insurmountable odds
Germany had been ramping up their military and triggered a war when many of the Alliance forces were in a time of relative stability and so had less military ready to go, alliance lost many of the early fights until they started fighting them on multiple fronts
Yes. Germany fought in multiple fronts and lost. Allied, as individual countries, fought mainly on a single front in WW1 and WW2, biggest exception being the US in WW2. And they came in late with an unmatched capacity.
I… I don’t think wars work like that…