@aesthr I see it as another tool, that helps me do my work. Like I used Stackoverflow for everything - that was already deskilling me. Every convenience is kind of deskilling, otherwise we would all still know how to code assembler, but that's not neccessary anymore.
There is also peer pressure in the office, that nudges everyone to use AI.

But that's just work. With my private projects, mainly music (plus album covers & music videos) , I wouldn't touch it.

@aesthr no I don’t think I’m immune. But since AI use is pointless without verification, you can put your brain into engineering systems that verify. We’ve done this before but now it’s even more important.
In a way it also allows me to use less brain cells for my work and more brain cells for private life.

To be honest, I only have a vague idea what AI psychosis is.. I would need a better definition to understand whether I’m prone to it or not.

@aesthr
I don't use "AI". I tried it and I saw colleagues using it and it doesn't do anything for me at all. And for them, to be honest, but the first thing they seem to have lost is the ability to recognize quality.

My current employer encourages the use, expects a rise in productivity by 16,5% but has not figured out yet how to measure productivity yet (or in what SI unit it is measured). So they are using it as a blame game to find a reason to move jobs to cheap wage countries, telling us that we are way too expensive and therefore need to be layed off.

They have no idea I refuse to use "AI"...

@aesthr I know a guy whose employer outright requires him to use Claude to write code. The CTO banned "manual coding." He knows he's deskilling but that's how he's keeping his job. There's also a sort of token board and as long as you're not an outlier management will leave you alone, so the incentive is to have Claude do everything: name branches, pull, open a file, etc.

@aesthr What makes me special? I’m not special. But I am, first and foremost, aware of what an LLM *is* and what it *is not*. It *is* a way to do text prediction. It *is not* intelligent, or “smart” or “compassionate” or “empathetic”. It’s a way of regurgitating stuff that has been written before. And the Internet, because of humanity, is fucked up and it’s impossible for me, a human, to find the answer to anything. I am more than happy to let a computer wade through all the advertising bullshit and lies and give me a usable answer.

Lemme ask *you* a serious question: Is there any sequence of letters that an LLM could output that would lead you to believe that it *is* intelligent? If so, why?

@aesthr It's no different than tasking an intern or junior.

@aesthr i started using it because I kinda got pressured into and was depressed and insecure about my own skills. Later I have seen that I have become a meat proxy and hate this. So to prevent me becoming dumber and dumber, I recently doubled down on books and online ressources on topics that interest me and where I want to become better. I have named this journey "Getting my brain back" and hope to achieve my goal of getting rid of it as soon as possible (which means also saving money :D)

@aesthr Thanks for posting this. Now I can go through the replies and block the clankers.

@aesthr

There are risks. But:

* I take control frequently enough.

* I’m frugal and refuse to let AI do IDE-shaped tasks

* A study found that people with “need for cognition” have protection against decline. It’s not scientific, but I diagnose myself as having that. I observe that my colleagues or ex-colleagues are deskilling much faster than me.

* I will need to use AI to remain competitive with peers

* I really hope I’m not still doing this in 10 years anyway

@aesthr I am in the position where I don't have to use it (due do currently doing else).

However, I used it for some projects. Setup opencode with the free tier of a chinese engine. Did some simple stuff and a font previewer in Vala for linux/gtk.

I stopped using because the previewer kept on leaking memory like hell and, due having done it in a language I'm not familiar with, I wasn't skilled enough to fix it.

On that day, I felt my brain going mush. I was very, very scared.

@aesthr The number of people in the replies who don't qualify as "willing" users is flat out terrifying. I've never seen a "tool" forced on people like this

@aesthr I don't willingly use it, but the mental rot is still there. A lot of it stems from abandoning any sense of ownership over code and projects, and checking out from the corporate employer. None of my previous employers really valued genuine technical expertise, either. Anyone who ever held the potential to make *great* software was always directed to dull their mind's edge by repeatedly striking it against hard rocks. They either gave up or moved on. But now, nowhere to move on to.

@aesthr I’m using AI and I work very closely with LLMs - I’m building engineering system around them, I’m aware of limitations and I’m very critical when it comes to their output. At the same time I see how llms can be useful when used responsibly. As always, critical thinking is key. I'm not worried about psychosis I'm more worried about losing skills, but then again, who can do quick calculations without a calculator these days? We lose some skills and gain others

@aesthr willingly? Sort of. We are forced to use Copilot at work, and I do find it useful for data entry type tasks, pulling information from Acrobat files into spreadsheets. Never ever let it write my emails or anything like that. Loss of skill? Maybe? I used to get more creative trying to work around the insufficient reporting we get from various sources but on the other hand, now I have time to review the content of those files so I'm not sure. I try to do the work humans are better at.