Neil: works very hard on his cybersecurity, and still worries a lot.
Also:
> The attack exploited a test account, known as ‘Test2’, that had existed for more than 12 years and had either remained active since it was created or been inadvertently reactivated before the incident. It was found that throughout this period, the ‘Test2’ account was protected by the password ‘Password1’, which, when checked against a third-party password strength tool, was classified as ‘very weak’ and could be compromised in less than a second.
@neil increasingly of the view that it's all fucking security theatre, apart from then it's not, and then the theatre was never going to help anyway.