@xerz @star to be fair, a lot of the cases where a file hash is provided (foo.net listing the hash of a file you download... from foo.net) is simply not security relevant.
unless the file is actually being hosted on a mirror and the file hash isn't.
in that case, yeah, it makes sense (but also you still kinda need to trust the mirror because in 99% of cases people won't check the hash unless you do it automatically)
@5225225@furry.engineer @xerz@masfloss.net noooooo, "not security relevant" is not a good excuseeee!!!! this is how usage of md5 proliferates/continues lkjhslkjhdfglkjhsdflkjhsdfglkjhsdgflkjhsdgflkjh
there are simply much better, much safer, much faster hashing algorithms out there! like sha512 or blake3 my beloved