1 Boost
37 Likes
but who asked for this? doesn’t every software have their own preferred place for suggestions? why do we need to centralize this?
I needed this for Pixelfed and Loops, and figured that the existing auth system in FediDB would be easier and more frictionless for people to use their existing fediverse accounts, rather than make new accounts for this. The fact any other project can also use it is another benefit.
Seems reasonable to offer projects a way to opt out of this.
So this seems to have no sync to the official repo? So users might bring suggestions there and the Mastodon devs never see them because they are working in their own Github?
This is on our todo list!
This blog post reads like AI slop.
Dansup does rely on LLMs, so it wouldn’t surprise me.
@taco_shale032@lemmy.ml @jonathan@piefed.social provide us proof for your maga tactics, don't just shout fake news
My apologies, this is what I gathered from other users in combination with Pixelfed (or loops?) allowing LLM contributions at some point. I should’ve done some research to confirm before assuming it was true.
Now that I am doing some research about it, could someone explain what this commit is about? Skill markdown files are for LLMs.
I see you publishing improvements to fedidb but i doesn’t seem to me the source code is being update. Are you publishing these changes as open source?
Also misskey is reporting incorrect numbers. i reported it here. tbh it makes it kinda harder to trust the reliability of fedidb.
Also any reason why it shows a graph of active users for software like lemmy but not for piefed?
Thanks for working on this!
Software | FediDB
misskey reporting incorrect numbers · Issue #39 · fedidb/fedidb-nuxt
FediDB
Software | FediDB