Discussion
trouble with both the Microsoft and FAA fuckups is that both are fully explicable by normal idiot management decision making around IT
so before we can state in an article/episode that either was caused more or less directly by the AI, and not standard pre-AI incompetence, we need more direct evidence
it's most frustrating
@davidgerard Journalists should’ve asked the FAA what caused the “data overload” and what guarantees there are that this won’t happen again? Blaming old equipment isn’t enough of an explanation.
@davidgerard “never attribute to artificial intelligence that which can be adequately explained by natural stupidity”
@davidgerard capitalism
It's capitalism
AI is fine when used properly
Everything this week is capitalism problems
@jpaskaruk that third line turns out to be a near empty set however
@davidgerard Hanlons Razor for me. I can absolutely see someone doing an update on a Friday that took it down. Whether they couldn’t be arsed to check properly or were pushed to do it is just extra detail.
@davidgerard AI enables more idiot managers to fuck up way more things much faster, what's not to like 🤡
@davidgerard I think MS is more about the cloud compute cartel that the hyperscalers run. They don’t need to be good so they arent
I don't feel like it's my responsibility to tell anyone "perhaps this wasn't a direct failure of AI, it's more complex than that"
When those who have foisted AI into everything have done less than nothing to educate people about what this technology really is, what it can and can't do.
If the general public thinks "they put AI in it and then it broke" well then. How is that different from "they put AI in it and now it's amazing" ?
@futurebird @davidgerard yes. Don't ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence. It works both ways round. And also if you substitute AI for incompetence.
@futurebird yeah, but it sort of is my responsibility to do that! i need to be precise and i need more facts for that
@futurebird It's an explanation I want to be true, therefore it is true. /s 🤪 @davidgerard
@thejessiekirk @futurebird @davidgerard@circumstances.run
Yes, why saving them from getting hoist by their own petard? They kept "putting AI into" everything, now they're blaming AI. It actually fits my agenda nicely, so who am I to dig them out of the hole they dug for themselves?
@thejessiekirk @futurebird so many times i see the *best* headline for a Pivot story and I look and it isn't true/solid
There is also a big incentive to hide any evidence that this is the case if true.
So, in a way we can only look at the wider picture. Have there been more software failures as of late? Have they happened in ways that we might not normally expect?
And even if there was evidence that it was vibe-coded software that failed some would still say that it was just "not prompted correctly" or "not reviewed enough" etc. so in the end it's always human error.
But that's the point.
@davidgerard in pre-AI terms, they’d be like the 100-year floods that we now see every few years
@davidgerard is it that big a difference, given that AI and nonsense tech management come from the same culture? but: yes, it's a frustrating wait for the SuperFail.
@davidgerard you are definitely correct. However, the "we are jamming generated code into everything" people and the "buffoonish fuckwits who fire 1000s to juice the stock price" people ARE THE SAME PEOPLE.
They are responsible, and we can remind everyone of that. The mechanism of failure is downstream, and I am arguing, irrelevant.