I'm on holiday for a month, there's nothing to do other than practice calisthenics and waste time on useless programming ideas!
https://wiki.xxiivv.com/etc/rejoicerepl/index.html#reversible_product
@jack are you also working on your handstands by any chance?
@neauoire Not this cycle, though I have worked up to a very nice press to handstand in the past. Are they your current focus?
@jack Press to handstand is precisely my winter project, I practice everyday for about an hour spread throughout the day, I don't have the strength right now to move from a pike pushup to a handstand, so I'm practicing the reverse for now. I love it : )
@bleeptrack @jack I do! I think if I had to start over I'd do push-up and pull-ups.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnLjItl57_4
And if you feel adventurous, handstands!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNC5lkoE2Fs
Either way, the goal is so have fun, so if you find something that feels especially nice, build from that. I love that you're interested in starting on calisthenics!
@neauoire I don't think t is necessary here (also since the value of t ends up being the same as the original value of y, I think it makes the reversible computation less interesting since the inputs are effectively still around before you call lum)
@mia without t, it will fail reversion if x or y is zero.
@neauoire oh, good point (although it does work if y = 0. the only complicated case is x = 0)
@mia yeah, it's kind of interesting to see what breaks with reversion, I'm stayed away from labels for a bit, but I would love to write a kind of program validator that tells me if a program is reversible or not, I've been collecting notes on that recently.
@neauoire Same, same