> Not long ago, Mary Beard graced us with a bit of honorable honesty in the Times Literary Supplement, in which she confessed to what is a bit of an open secret among most classicists. She can't sight-read a complex Latin text all that well. Most classicists can't. This admission — from someone like Beard — is good to have out there.
> What irritates me is that —again like most classicists — she treats this as a self-evident fact to be just accepted rather than a problem to be dealt with, as if nobody could hope to actually read Cicero with ease. It always strikes me as bizarre and a bit embarrassing to see classicists insisting that it is impossible to acquire fluid or fluent command of Latin or Greek, that "we" can never do this.
https://blogicarian.blogspot.com/2019/03/argumentum-ad-ignorantiam.html
See also the comments at metafilter, where people argue that indeed, it is unrealistic to expect one of the world's most famous classicists to be fluent in ancient greek and latin, because the word order is just so different.
https://www.metafilter.com/181221/Lingua-pulcherrima
0 Boosts
0 Likes
@lain Are they seriously arguing that it's unrealistic for a student of a language to be fluent in it? Am i understanding this right?
@moth_ball maybe it's an uncharitable reading, but i think at least partially they do. Reminds me of all the 'middle east experts' who can't even speak arabic.
@lain this is just one thin layer away from that sign language intepreter who got a gig at the US government and just flailed hands randomly
This isn't restricted to classicists either. I'm confident that most people who have a degree in japanese studies can not meaningfully read or speak japanese.
@lain a lot of people who have a degree in computer science cannot code
here's mary beard's original article: https://web.archive.org/web/20200725191540/https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/what-does-the-latin-actually-say/
What does the Latin actually say? - Mary Beard: A Don’s life - TLS