@aesthr I was a CTO 25 years ago, Been an architect since. I have trained dozens of young programmers. Handing work off has caused me no issues that I am aware of. I don't write bash scripts, have no interest in learning, and Deepseek is pretty good at it.

I am quite sure that using LLMs in every part of my life would do me real damage. So I don't.

Driving a car will reduce your ability to walk long distances. I'm not giving up my car, but I do go to the gym every morning.

@aesthr If yes that's already an early symptom of being susceptible to it

@aesthr no because I effectively have a gun to my head in my career. If I don’t embrace AI and figure out how to work with it, I will be fired.

It’s like being demanded to use cocaine or something. It’s awful. I know it’s bad but I don’t know what else to do right now except keep my eyes open for an opportunity to leave software engineering.

@aesthr
I hadn’t really thought about it before. I’ll admit that I delegate quite a few things and have been using AI daily for about four years. But, thinking it over, I realized that this fits what I want: I like orchestrating the process, and there are some things I’m simply not interested in learning how to make. I’m happy with the final result.

@aesthr my answer is "no" to all.

But I'm an unwilling user, working for cultists

@aesthr I have a disability that prevents me from doing heavy research. I will *occasionally* use an LLM to get a gist of something whose understanding is not critical and would be dangerous for me to reach on my own. (Once a week, max) E.G. I recently asked ChatGPT why asbestos is dangerous but fiberglass and carbon fiber are less so. I don't work with any of them, it was just a nagging curiosity.

As for skill loss.... You shouldn't be using it in areas where your skills matter.

@aesthr I think nobody is immune, and I'd be more worried about someone who says they are.

@aesthr

If we learned anything from the ongoing COVID pandemic, it's that people are singularly incapable of assessing risk, and extremely skilled at rationalizing and minimizing injury post-hoc.

@aesthr In the months when I started using LLMs on the daily I went through periods of psychosis where things felt one or more of the following: (a) what I'm doing is meaningless, (b) high's like you can approach any problem and solve it quickly (reality check, of course you can't, bit this is what power or empowerment feels like, (c) depression like perhaps I'm not really that good or good enough anymore, (d) elevated anxiety due to constant context switching.

I am concerned about what you mention, and I do wonder how best it should be approached without losing the the technology. One thing I'm exploring is developing and learning more problem solving thinking tools, but right now I'm more focussed on the tool than using it, so that's a bit of a moot point right noe, but perhaps not in the future when I start using it.

I think we will remain able to construct challenges in the small that translate to changes in the large, like if you play with lego blocks it might translate to other things in life. I expect a lot more higher level programming languages to be developed if we care about understanding. And I'm quite sure that many folks still want to understand things, I know I still do despite it being hard and not always possible. I'm humbled by the issues and bugs I've created that an LLM picked up and pointed out. I believe there are enough folks out there that still want understanding.

@aesthr The number of people who seem otherwise sensible who are saying “I was talking about this with Chat GPT and it said…” blows my mind. They are using it as a sounding board on personal issues or to ask if there’s scientific literature to support something they were thinking about. 🤦🏻‍♀️

It’s like those creepy toys in the 80’s and 90’s (maybe they’re still around) that you could push a button or speak a phrase and it would tell you that it loves you. But these are *adults*. 🙃

@aesthr I try to avoid deskilling by not using AI to generate anything that I actually end up using as-is. Meaning:

1) I mostly use it to review/search things that I then analyse myself

2) In the rare cases I do ask it for some reference code (e.g. something I don't want to necessarily be proficient in but need to use that one time, etc) I always re-type and reorganize the code myself and search the documentation of every construct used that I'm not familiar with to see if it fits, and learn

@aesthr @LilaHexe No - Yes

@aesthr yes, because I think those risks are overstated. 🙂

I organically time-limit my use and have reconfigured the personality because I don't want to be friends with a chat bot, for the same reason I don't want to be friends with my electric tea kettle. My smart home assistant is called "Computer" for similar reasons.

As for atrophying skills, I feel that's like saying that using a microwave for a few meals a week means that I'll forget how to cook. My lived reality is that I don't need to cook a roast dinner every day to remember how to cook a roast dinner. 🤔

Finally re: cognitive decline, I guess that depends on what people do with the time they're saving over a sustained period of time. Some people will use it to improve their mind and body. Others will indulge in vices and pleasures of the flesh. Whatever they were doing before AI is what they'll probably continue doing unless they decide otherwise. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@aesthr de-skilling no, It's probably just a matter of lazyness and speed.
I also know that I should spend less time on social media and more reading books or exercising against cognitive decline, but that too is hard.

AI psychosis: not really worried. I am fully aware that LLMs do not think in a traditional sense of the word. It's a powerful, though potentially harmful to society, tool, nothing more.

@aesthr The risks to my employment rank higher.