About Linux kernel, not all of them share the opinion that LLMs are really helpful in every way. There is a talk about how they affect the kernel work on a daily basis, the first 35 minutes is the talk, rest questions and answers: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=NnV_cWeoo5Q -> I don't want to know how much energy is only wasted for all these thousands of bug reports that are duplicated, already fixed, stolen from researchers that were using LLM chats and so on. How can Linus still make such a strong claims when it is clearly not that helpful? When patches even include human fails from 20 years ago, because the data is trained by the whole history of human mistakes, too?

Sad to hear about Bitwarden, but never used it. I always had the feeling this will happen. Even more sad about KeepassXC, because I used it and was happy, but never realized the vibecoding policy and I don't trust those who are not only using them on such important security applications, but especially that early. Was looking deeper into it and it seems there is an anti-AI fork called Chipass that forked the version before KeepassXC was introducing the new policy. I will look a bit deeper next days, but currently I am 80% sure to switch over to it. The browser integration for KeepassXC is not allowing LLMs and support Chi, so no issues at this front. Chi is hosted on Codeberg for those also want to give a look.